« Répéteur quantique » : différence entre les versions


(Page créée avec « ==en construction== == Définition == XXXXXXXXX == Français == ''' XXXXXXXXX ''' == Anglais == ''' Quantum repeater ''' Materials in cables can absorb photons, which... »)
 
m (ClaireGorjux a déplacé la page Quantum repeater vers Répéteur quantique)
(Aucune différence)

Version du 11 février 2022 à 14:26

en construction

Définition

XXXXXXXXX

Français

XXXXXXXXX

Anglais

Quantum repeater

Materials in cables can absorb photons, which means they can typically travel for no more than a few tens of kilometers. In a classical network, repeaters at various points along a cable are used to amplify the signal to compensate for this.

QKD networks have come up with a similar solution, creating “trusted nodes” at various points. The Beijing-to-Shanghai network has 32 of them, for instance. At these waystations, quantum keys are decrypted into bits and then reencrypted in a fresh quantum state for their journey to the next node. But this means trusted nodes can’t really be trusted: a hacker who breached the nodes’ security could copy the bits undetected and thus acquire a key, as could a company or government running the nodes.

Ideally, we need quantum repeaters, or waystations with quantum processors in them that would allow encryption keys to remain in quantum form as they are amplified and sent over long distances. Researchers have demonstrated it’s possible in principle to build such repeaters, but they haven’t yet been able to produce a working prototype.

There’s another issue with QKD. The underlying data is still transmitted as encrypted bits across conventional networks. This means a hacker who breached a network’s defenses could copy the bits undetected, and then use powerful computers to try to crack the key used to encrypt them.


Source : technologyreview



Contributeurs: Claire Gorjux, wiki